“It would be one thing if it was one day, but it’s four days, almost an entire school week,” Peterson said. “We don’t have enough school weeks as it is.”
The four pupil-free days will be implemented next year as a one-year experiment, then the matter will appear before the board at the end of the year to determine if the district will continue with the program.
As he had done at last month’s board meeting, Ron Dietel, a former La Cañada school board member and the assistant director for research, use and communications at the UCLA Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards and Student Testing, addressed the board with his concerns surrounding eliminating four days of class.
Dietel said some research has shown that teachers’ professional development is one of the weakest contributors to improving student performance. He said he was also concerned because there is no written plan for what will be accomplished during the four pupil-free days.
“I wouldn’t build my house without a written plan,” Dietel said. “This is a huge, huge change, losing four days of school. Any change you make is going to have an effect, and this is going to be a big one.”
Wendy Sinnette, LCUSD’s assistant superintendent of human resources, said crafting a plan is an ongoing process.
“We are making sure there is accountability and that there are actual benefits to students,” Sinnette said. “The benefit must manifest itself in results.”
Governing Board President Susan Boyd said teachers will use the time from the four free days to analyze their classroom data and figure out where they need to specifically focus their instruction.