Last week, The Times reported new numbers. The city of Bell paid $422,707 to the director of administrative services, $421,402 to the director of general services, $273,542 to the director of community services and $295,627 to the business development coordinator.
A business development coordinator?
Bell is a blue-collar town that covers 2.5 square miles and has a population of 38,000 with a mean household income of $40,556. It is one-quarter the size of La Cañada Flintridge, has twice as many residents, with one-third of our income.
There are a lot of ways to report on this debacle. I could write a column about walking my dog (Miss Hepburn) down Foothill Boulevard with the ousted city manager rappelling from a helicopter. I could include news clippings (yellowed with age) from the 1920s, showing the relative costs of reptiles sold at "Snake Joe" Houtenbrink's snake farm. I could ask, "What the heck is a "business development coordinator" ($295,627)?
The scandal in Bell merits a more serious approach.
Unlike La Cañada Flintridge, which has trees and hiking trails and whose residents have the longest life expectancy in the region, the city of Bell does not provide a quality of life to its residents.
James Corcoran, a retired Bell police sergeant, filed a lawsuit against the city of Bell. He alleges that Bell police officers delivered absentee ballots to voters and instructed the voters on how to vote.
In 2005, only 400 people voted in the city council election in Bell. The part-time council members reportedly earned $100,000 per year.